
One technique that he mentions is a technique that walter murch uses who
is a film editor and sound designer as mention in my previous blog posts. The
technique involves editing the picture without hearing the synced sound track,
you are editing the picture in silence. He says that this approach can
ironically be a great boon to the use of sound in the movie. He also says that
if the editor can imagine the sound which might eventually accompany a scene
rather than listen to the rough dis-continuous, often annoying sync track then
the cutting will be more likely to leave room for those beats in which sound
other than dialogue will eventually make its contribution. I think this makes a
lot of sense, I have only edited a few times and while editing the scenes
together the audio was quite annoying and distracted me from making certain
cuts and transitions that I might have done if I were working in silence.
He also lists a few bullet points of what sound can do for a film
· Suggest a
mood evoke a feeling
· Set a
pace
· Indicate a
geographical locale
· Indicate a
historical period
· Clarify the
plot
· Define a
character
· Connect otherwise
unconnected ideas characters, places images or moments
· Heighten realism
or diminish it
· Draw attention
to detail or away from it
· Indicate changes
in time
· Smooth otherwise
abrupt changes between shots or sscenes
· Emphasize
a transition for dramatic effect
· Describe an
acoustic space
· Startle or
soothe
No comments:
Post a Comment
comment here yo